Save the Forest, stop Smoking!

Unlike other European countries, Sweden has the smallest percentage of fires in the Forest. Perhaps because of people’s consciousness, perhaps because of the law, and maybe because of Snus. A traditional smokeless tobacco product from Sweden(available also on snus uk) unlike chewing tobacco, it’s not a loose product, it’s putted in bags, and spitting is not required. It’s also regulated as Food by the Swedish food administration. Not that it’s healthier than cigarettes, it’s also safe for the Forest, and instead of smoking in the forest, you should use this Swedish innovation, that safe people that surround you and the Nature. We do not say that this is one of the main parameters, because Sweden have the lowest percentage of Wildfires, but you can not agree with me that it’s a smarter way than to smoke.  We need to educate, to teach, to help people in the United Kingdom and all over the world, how they can save the forest, the lungs of our Earth from Wildfires.  Here we can see what a famous Danish Banker said about wildfires in his Neighborhood!
You can buy smokeless tobacco here: Snus United Kingdom


”A forest means more than just money to individual owners. It’s something you’ve grown and cared for throughout many generations, and having that wiped out can be absolutely devastating,” Johan Freij

An Activist, Signe Bjorklund said: ” We need to avoid fire in the forest, by not bring fire able materials to the Forest,  that’s the half way of prevention.”, said Bjorklund in an Interview for a local Swedish Radio

According to this statement we have researched a little bit, and by some sources 3 from 10 Wildfires are caused because of Cigarettes. We would be happy if we could safe one Three from a fire, that’s why we suggest to bring Snus instead of Cigarettes to the Forest. Let’s use Swedish mentality, and start snusing instead of smoking  in the wildness. A Cigarette must be thrown, but Snus is spittles

Campain against airlines

We all know that airlines pollutes the enviornment some do it more than others. We want to encourage our followers to call them up and make them aware of what they are doing to the enviornment. So we have picked three airlines that we want you to contact and make complaints to their customer service. Feel free to contact other airlines if you want. To find all contact numbers visit So now we will give you some general information about the companies you are about to call.

  • Tomas Cook Airlines is listed on the London Stock Exchange. The airline is active in 19 countries with 23 million customers annually and 29 000 employees. Since October 1, 2013, Thomas Cook Group changed its identity and launched “The Sunny Heart” as a new joint symbol for the group. The idea behind The Sunny Heart is based on the brand strategy. With this combined Thomas Cook Group during the same graphic identity. So in order words , they can take some angry calls. Contact Thomas Cook customer service and execute!
  • British Airways was created when airlines BOAC and BEA merged 2 and is the UK’s major airlines. The company is the country’s largest airline in terms of fleet size, international flights and international destinations. It is also one of Europe’s largest air operators and transported most passengers for Lufthansa, Ryanair and Air France-KLM. BA has more Atlantic flights than any other company and offers, among other frequent flights between London and New York. British airways customer service usually have a long line but be patient!
  • easyJet is an airline based in Luton Airport. The airline is one of Europe’s largest low cost airlines and transports the most passengers of any airline in the UK, and has both national and international scheduled routes, with a total of 437 routes between 111 airports in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East. The airline offers mainly low-cost tickets, but is sometimes used as a full-service company on charter flights on behalf of other companies. Click to find the number for easyJet customer service.
  • Ryanair is an Irish airline headquartered in Dublin. The company’s main aviation hub is London Stansted in England. Ryanair is Europe’s largest low cost and it is one of the world’s most successful airlines. Ryanair has over 1 600 routes to 30 countries around Europe and North Africa. Ryanair has become known thanks to its strong expansion, as a result of air traffic in Europe was liberalized in 1997.Ryanair customer service is used to rude calls to be a little extra hard on them.

No harvesting forests is not good for the climate

All agree that it is bad for the climate to chop down the tropical rainforest. But the forest industry claims that in United Kingdom the opposite is true for the climate to chop down the forest and cultivate it. Here we will address their arguments one by one to show that the current UK forestry climate benefits are questionable.

Adolescent forest store the carbon. It’s true. But back a little: before the young forest, there was a clear-cut, and before clearing a fully grown forest. The full-grown forests contained more carbon than young forest because the trees were rough, and this carbon is released largely out when the trees used to make paper, fuel, and wood products. A forest that will remain also continues to store carbon in the soil in the long term, including through slowly decomposing plant material and fungi thread system in the ground. When the forest kalavverkas released not only the carbon in the trees, but the land is disturbed and greenhouse gases leaking from the felling area for at least ten years. About a quarter of United Kingdom’s carbon dioxide emissions come from clearcutting.

Eventually, the forest grows back up and store the carbon in trees and soil, but if an ancient forest kalavverkas it takes a long time before it stores a lot of carbon again. We have not the time! According to the IPCC, we must reduce greenhouse gases immediately to avoid an even warmer climate. In the long term stored carbon in forest and land again, but in the short term (say 10-20 years) it does not matter if the carbon dioxide is coming from fossil fuels or biomass from forest – the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere increases, in which case, and the short time perspective is important if we are to mitigate the greenhouse effect. The short-term emissions may even be greater biofuel from forestry, because there will be emissions from the clear-cut as well, besides the fuel itself. The carbon cycle is complicated and we do not know everything. We should be wary of releasing carbon dioxide, because it is uncertain how much is absorbed and when.

Long-lived wood products (such as houses) stores carbon and replace more energy-intensive materials. Although it is better to build houses of wood than concrete, so lasting, most wood products do not last as long as a house. Nor is obviously better to replace more energy-intensive materials with wood: we must first consider whether we should make the product at all. In any case, much of the forest cut down short-lived paper products, packaging, advertising and prints / copies, many of which are thrown on the same day. The coal from these ports quickly in the atmosphere.

It is good to replace fossil fuels with biofuels. Yes, we need to stop using fossil fuels. But it is not obviously good to readily replace fossil fuels with biofuels. It depends on what we use energy for: to chop down the forest, for example, be able to continue with mass motoring does not hold in the long run. Fossil fuels come from plants stored over millions of years and we are burning up at breakneck speed; we obviously can not get out as much energy by harvesting the forest that grows in our lifetime. Biofuels can only make a limited contribution to managing the transition from fossil fuels globally, and since they also carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are something we should conserve, not something that actually benefits the climate. We need to reduce our energy use and find other energy sources.

The forest industry often use forestry alleged climate benefits as a reason to justify increased logging and to override the modern forestry threat to biodiversity. As we saw in the first part of the article forestry climate arguments major shortcomings. But in addition it is wrong to put climate change on biodiversity loss: both are in themselves major threat to humans and the ecosystems we depend on. These two threats are also linked – the species-poor monocultures that promote forestry are more vulnerable to future climate change, and climate change is itself a threat to biodiversity.

Positive news

Forests in Europe have grown by more than 30% since 1950, rising by 1.5 million football pitches every year – an area that is four times larger than London.

“90% of deforestation is due to the application of unsustainable agricultural practices.”
Underlying causes of deforestation, the World Rainforest Movement; UN FAO

55% of the world’s deforestation is used to produce energy and 25% is used for construction. Other applications are also available, but the paper takes only 11% directly and can also use up to 7% of the construction waste.

In some countries, particularly in the tropics, disputes over land rights and the conversion of natural forests to industrial plantations, something that worries the paper industry, NGOs and consumers.

“The single biggest direct cause of tropical deforestation is the conversion of forests to cropland and pastures, mainly in the supply end.”, April 2013

Two Sides initiative supports solutions to these problems, and recognizing the need to promote products which can be clearly traced to sustainable sources.

In northern Europe, where almost all old-growth forests are protected, paper comes from managed, semi-natural forests where the cycle of planting, growth and harvesting is carefully controlled. History stumbling blocks in northern Europe and Canada has now largely been resolved through cooperation between regulators, environmental groups and the forest industry in order to protect virgin forests.

“82.7% of the mass we use originate in Europe.”

CEPI Sustainability Report, 2011, Page 26

Forests constitute a natural habitat for wildlife. There is always room for improvement and European Environment Agency has declared that ‘Forestry chips in Europe develop in a way that can be considered good for biodiversity’.  All pulp imported to Europe meets the requirements of the EU Timber Regulation, which prohibits the import of wood products from illegally harvested timber.